Skip to main content

Credentials Bruteforce Bypass via Password Spraying Attack

I wrote about Password Spraying Attacks on OWASP, where I explained how this technique differs from traditional brute force attacks. In simple terms, Password spraying is a variant of brute force attack methodology employed by malicious actors to gain unauthorized access to a system or application. In this type of attack, the assailant systematically attempts logins by using a list of usernames in conjunction with a single password—often a commonly used or default password. Unlike traditional brute force attacks, where multiple passwords are tried against a single account, password spraying involves trying one password across numerous accounts to evade account lockout mechanisms that would typically be triggered by repeated attempts on a single account. In this blog, I’m sharing the same insights with some additional context for readers of my personal site. Understanding this attack and its mitigations is crucial to building stronger defenses against evolving threats.

This technique is particularly effective in instances where the application or administrator has established default passwords for new users. The attacker, by leveraging a single password across multiple accounts, aims to exploit instances where users have not changed their default passwords. This underscores the significance of implementing robust password policies, encouraging users to set unique and strong passwords, and regularly updating default passwords to mitigate the risk of password spraying attacks.

Password spraying underscores the importance of heightened security measures, including the establishment of strong, unique passwords, regular password updates, and vigilant monitoring for anomalous login patterns. Implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA) can further enhance security by adding an additional layer of protection even if passwords are compromised.

It is crucial for organizations to remain vigilant against password spraying attacks and continually assess and enhance their security protocols to safeguard against evolving cyber threats.

Mitigating the risks associated with password spraying attacks requires a comprehensive and layered approach. Here are some recommended mitigations:

1. Username and Password Brute Force Prevention:

   - Implement robust policies to prevent brute force attacks on both usernames and passwords.

   - Monitor and set thresholds for failed login attempts on both fields to detect and respond to suspicious activities promptly.

2. Account Lockout Policies:

   - Enforce account lockout policies after a specified number of failed login attempts to hinder attackers from guessing credentials.

   - Carefully configure lockout duration and thresholds to balance security and user convenience.

3. CAPTCHA Implementation:

   - Consider implementing CAPTCHA mechanisms to thwart automated password spraying attempts.

   - In scenarios where account lockout is not a feasible option, CAPTCHA provides an additional layer of defense against automated attacks.

4. Password Change on First Login:

   - For applications managed by administrators, mandate users to change their passwords on the first login, especially when default passwords are initially assigned.

   - Encourage the use of strong, unique passwords during the password change process.

5. Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA):

   - Deploy multi-factor authentication to add an extra layer of security beyond passwords.

   - Implement MFA for both internal and externally facing services to fortify access controls.

6. Enhanced Security Education:

   - Conduct regular security awareness training for users to emphasize the importance of setting strong passwords, promptly changing default passwords, and recognizing phishing attempts.

7. Regular Password Audits:

   - Periodically audit user accounts to identify and rectify weak or default passwords.

   - Implement processes to prompt users to update their passwords regularly.

8. Monitoring and Anomaly Detection:

   - Implement real-time monitoring and anomaly detection to identify unusual patterns in login activity.

   - Establish alerting mechanisms to notify administrators of potential security incidents.

9. Continuous Security Assessment:

   - Regularly assess and update security protocols to adapt to evolving threats.

   - Conduct penetration testing to identify vulnerabilities and validate the effectiveness of security measures.

By adopting a combination of these measures, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of password spraying attacks and enhance the overall security posture of their systems and applications.

Reference

https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Password_Spraying_Attack

Comments

Security blog of the month

Understanding the CISSP Exam Pattern: Is There Negative Marking?

The  Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP)  certification, offered by (ISC)², is one of the most recognized credentials in the cybersecurity industry . It validates an individual’s ability to design, implement, and manage a best-in-class cybersecurity program. Let’s break down the CISSP exam structure and address a common question:  Is there negative marking in the CISSP exam?